[openstack-dev] [Fuel] fuel master monitoring
Dmitriy Shulyak
dshulyak at mirantis.com
Thu Nov 27 08:53:56 UTC 2014
Is it possible to send http requests from monit, e.g for creating
notifications?
I scanned through the docs and found only alerts for sending mail,
also where token (username/pass) for monit will be stored?
Or maybe there is another plan? without any api interaction
On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 9:39 AM, Przemyslaw Kaminski <pkaminski at mirantis.com
> wrote:
> This I didn't know. It's true in fact, I checked the manifests. Though
> monit is not deployed yet because of lack of packages in Fuel ISO. Anyways,
> I think the argument about using yet another monitoring service is now
> rendered invalid.
>
> So +1 for monit? :)
>
> P.
>
>
> On 11/26/2014 05:55 PM, Sergii Golovatiuk wrote:
>
> Monit is easy and is used to control states of Compute nodes. We can adopt
> it for master node.
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Sergii Golovatiuk,
> Skype #golserge
> IRC #holser
>
> On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 4:46 PM, Stanislaw Bogatkin <
> sbogatkin at mirantis.com> wrote:
>
>> As for me - zabbix is overkill for one node. Zabbix Server + Agent +
>> Frontend + DB + HTTP server, and all of it for one node? Why not use
>> something that was developed for monitoring one node, doesn't have many
>> deps and work out of the box? Not necessarily Monit, but something similar.
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 6:22 PM, Przemyslaw Kaminski <
>> pkaminski at mirantis.com> wrote:
>>
>>> We want to monitor Fuel master node while Zabbix is only on slave nodes
>>> and not on master. The monitoring service is supposed to be installed on
>>> Fuel master host (not inside a Docker container) and provide basic info
>>> about free disk space, etc.
>>>
>>> P.
>>>
>>>
>>> On 11/26/2014 02:58 PM, Jay Pipes wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 11/26/2014 08:18 AM, Fox, Kevin M wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> So then in the end, there will be 3 monitoring systems to learn,
>>>>> configure, and debug? Monasca for cloud users, zabbix for most of the
>>>>> physical systems, and sensu or monit "to be small"?
>>>>>
>>>>> Seems very complicated.
>>>>>
>>>>> If not just monasca, why not the zabbix thats already being deployed?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Yes, I had the same thoughts... why not just use zabbix since it's used
>>>> already?
>>>>
>>>> Best,
>>>> -jay
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>>>> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>>> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing listOpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.orghttp://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20141127/ec2b42af/attachment.html>
More information about the OpenStack-dev
mailing list