Open Stack

On 14/11/14 15:46, Wood, Matthew David (HP Cloud - Horizon) wrote:
> On 11/14/14, 4:24 AM, "Jaromir Coufal" <jcoufal at redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>> My opinion and preference:
>> * horizon_lib (framework) + horizon (UI)
> 
> I agree with both the concept behind these names and the name selections
> given here.  People don¹t think of Nova as the framework, nor Neutron as
> the framework.  That¹s the server/service that we make rest calls against.
>  I like:
> 
> (horizon_lib or horizon_framework) and horizon

The concern with this raised by Matthias is that application developers
who currently do "import horizon" to build plug-ins will be surprised
and completely broken once they upgrade. Changing both names would
alleviate that a little.

Julie

> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>