Open Stack

+1
I think the best use of our time is to discuss new features and functions
that may have a api or functional impact for ironic or projects that depend
on ironic.

Chris Krelle

On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 8:22 AM, Ghe Rivero <ghe at debian.org> wrote:

> I agree that a lot of time is missed with the announcement and status
> reports, but mostly because irc is a slow bandwidth communication channel
> (like waiting several minutes for a 3 lines announcement to be written)
>
> I propose that any announcement and project status must be written in
> advanced to an etherpad, and during the irc meeting just have a slot for
> people to discuss anything that need further explanation, only mentioning
> the topic but not  the content.
>
> Ghe Rivero
> On Nov 13, 2014 5:08 PM, "Peeyush Gupta" <gpeeyush at linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> I agree with Lucas. Sounds like a good idea. I guess if we could spare
>> more time for discussing new features and requirements rather than
>> asking for status, that would be helpful for everyone.
>>
>> On 11/13/2014 05:45 PM, Lucas Alvares Gomes wrote:
>> > This was discussed in the Contributor Meetup on Friday at the Summit
>> > but I think it's important to share on the mail list too so we can get
>> > more opnions/suggestions/comments about it.
>> >
>> > In the Ironic weekly meeting we dedicate a good time of the meeting to
>> > do some announcements, reporting bug status, CI status, oslo status,
>> > specific drivers status, etc... It's all good information, but I
>> > believe that the mail list would be a better place to report it and
>> > then we can free some time from our meeting to actually discuss
>> > things.
>> >
>> > Are you guys in favor of it?
>> >
>> > If so I'd like to propose a new format based on the discussions we had
>> > in Paris. For the people doing the status report on the meeting, they
>> > would start adding the status to an etherpad and then we would have a
>> > responsible person to get this information and send it to the mail
>> > list once a week.
>> >
>> > For the meeting itself we have a wiki page with an agenda[1] which
>> > everyone can edit to put the topic they want to discuss in the meeting
>> > there, I think that's fine and works. The only change about it would
>> > be that we may want freeze the agenda 2 days before the meeting so
>> > people can take a look at the topics that will be discussed and
>> > prepare for it; With that we can move forward quicker with the
>> > discussions because people will be familiar with the topics already.
>> >
>> > Let me know what you guys think.
>> >
>> > [1] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Ironic
>> >
>> > Lucas
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > OpenStack-dev mailing list
>> > OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>> >
>>
>> --
>> Peeyush Gupta
>> gpeeyush at linux.vnet.ibm.com
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20141113/6da3caf0/attachment.html>