Open Stack

>
>
>> HA-Proxy version 1.4.24 2013/06/17 What was the reason this approach
>>  was dropped?
>>
>
> IIRC the major reason was that having 2 services on same port (but
> different interface) would be too confusing for anyone who is not aware
> of this fact.
>
>
 Major part of documentation for haproxy with vip setup is done with
duplicated ports.
>From my experience lb solutions have been made with load balancer sitting
on VIRTUAL_IP:STANDART_PORT and/or PUBLIC_VIRTUAL_IP:STANDART_PORT.

Maybe this is not so big issue? It will be much easier to start with such
deployment configuration

Dmitry
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20140516/618a6658/attachment.html>