Open Stack

On 5/6/2014 1:48 PM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
> Sandy Walsh wrote:
>> I'd be curious to know more what "managed" means in this situation? Is
>> the core project expected to allocate time in the IRC meeting to the
>> concerns of these adjacent projects? What if the core project doesn't
>> agree with the direction or deems there's too much overlap? Does the
>> core team instantly have sway over the adjacent project?
> It has to be basically the same team of people working on the two
> projects. The goals and the direction of the project are shared. There
> is no way it can work if you consider some "core" and some "adjacent",
> that would quickly create a us vs. them mentality and not work out that
> well in reviews.
>
> Of course, there can be contributors that are not interested in one
> project or another. But if you end up with completely-separated
> subteams, then there is little value in living under the same umbrella
> and sharing a core team.

Ok, that's what I thought. Thanks for the clarification.

-S