Open Stack

On 03/19/2014 01:47 PM, Mike Perez wrote:
> On 03/19/2014 08:20 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
>> As I understand it, all of the integrated projects have looked at Pecan,
>> and are anticipating the transition. Most have no reason to create a new
>> API version, and therefore build a new API service to avoid introducing
>> incompatibilities by rebuilding the existing API with a new tool. This
>> aligns with the plan when Pecan was proposed as a standard.
>>
>> Doug
> 
> I have evaluated it for Cinder and have spoke to numerous interested
> folks in Cinder about using Pecan. It's currently what we're planning to
> move to after I did a rough prototype for some of our core API
> controllers. As you mentioned, we have no reason to do a version bump
> yet. We'll likely do a bump to be py3 compatible rather than for a
> significant change.
> 

FWIW, we've also discussed it for Nova.  We approved converting to use
it for the v3 API that is still being worked on.  I hope to see that get
movement again during Juno.

-- 
Russell Bryant