Open Stack

Ok, so we don't want to switch to UCA, let's consider this variant.
What options do we have to make possible to run Ceilometer jobs with Mongo
backend?
I see only  https://review.openstack.org/#/c/81001/ or making Ceilometer
able to work with old Mongo. But the last variant looks inappropriate at
least in Icehouse.
What am I missing here? Maybe there is smth else we can do?


On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 9:28 PM, Tim Bell <Tim.Bell at cern.ch> wrote:

>
>
> If UCA is required, what would be the upgrade path for a currently running
> OpenStack Havana site to Icehouse with this requirement ?
>
>
>
> Would it be an online upgrade (i.e. what order to upgrade the different
> components in order to keep things running at all times) ?
>
>
>
> Tim
>
>
>
> *From:* Chmouel Boudjnah [mailto:chmouel at enovance.com]
> *Sent:* 18 March 2014 17:58
> *To:* OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> *Subject:* Re: [openstack-dev] [Ceilometer][QA][Tempest][Infra]
> Ceilometer tempest testing in gate
>
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 5:21 PM, Sean Dague <sean at dague.net> wrote:
>
>  So I'm still -1 at the point in making UCA our default run environment
> until it's provably functional for a period of time. Because working
> around upstream distro breaks is no fun.
>
>
>
> I agree, if UCA is not very stable ATM, this os going to cause us more
> pain, but what would be the plan of action? a non-voting gate for
> ceilometer as a start ? (if that's possible).
>
> Chmouel
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20140319/9537e82e/attachment.html>