Open Stack

On 03/04/2014 12:26 PM, Vishvananda Ishaya wrote:
> 
> On Mar 4, 2014, at 9:10 AM, Russell Bryant <rbryant at redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>> Thank you all for your participation on this topic.  It has been quite
>> controversial, but the API we expose to our users is a really big deal.
>> I'm feeling more and more confident that we're coming through this with
>> a much better understanding of the problem space overall, as well as a
>> better plan going forward than we had a few weeks ago.
> 
> Hey Russell,
> 
> Thanks for bringing this to the mailing list and being open to discussion
> and collaboration. Also, thanks to everyone who is participating in the
> plan. Doing this kind of thing in the open is difficult and it has lead to
> a ton of debate, but this is the right way to do things. It says a lot
> about the strength of our community that we are able to have conversations
> like this without devolving into arguments and flame wars.
> 
> Vish

+1, and definitely appreciate Russell's leadership through this whole
discussion.

	-Sean

-- 
Sean Dague
Samsung Research America
sean at dague.net / sean.dague at samsung.com
http://dague.net

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 482 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20140304/722451cd/attachment.pgp>