[openstack-dev] [Nova] Timeline for the rest of the Juno release

Russell Bryant rbryant at redhat.com
Tue Jun 24 14:00:16 UTC 2014

On 06/24/2014 08:56 AM, Anne Gentle wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 7:07 AM, Russell Bryant <rbryant at redhat.com
> <mailto:rbryant at redhat.com>> wrote:
>     On 06/24/2014 07:35 AM, Michael Still wrote:
>     > Phil -- I really want people to focus their efforts on fixing bugs in
>     > that period was the main thing. The theory was if we encouraged people
>     > to work on specs for the next release, then they'd be distracted from
>     > fixing the bugs we need fixed in J.
>     >
>     > Cheers,
>     > Michael
>     >
>     > On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 9:08 PM, Day, Phil <philip.day at hp.com
>     <mailto:philip.day at hp.com>> wrote:
>     >> Hi Michael,
>     >>
>     >> Not sure I understand the need for a gap between "Juno Spec
>     approval freeze" (Jul 10th) and "K opens for spec proposals" (Sep
>     4th).    I can understand that K specs won't get approved in that
>     period, and may not get much feedback from the cores - but I don't
>     see the harm in letting specs be submitted to the K directory for
>     early review / feedback during that period ?
>     I agree with both of you.  Priorities need to be finishing up J, but I
>     don't see any reason not to let people post K specs whenever.
>     Expectations just need to be set appropriately that it may be a while
>     before they get reviewed/approved.
> No, we need more discipline around bug fixing and also to reserve time
> for docs. 

I agree with the goal, but I don't think treating the specs repo as
off-limits helps.  What are we going to do, disable the project in gerrit?

I'd rather talk about the carrot.

Russell Bryant

More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list