Open Stack

On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 7:07 AM, Russell Bryant <rbryant at redhat.com> wrote:

> On 06/24/2014 07:35 AM, Michael Still wrote:
> > Phil -- I really want people to focus their efforts on fixing bugs in
> > that period was the main thing. The theory was if we encouraged people
> > to work on specs for the next release, then they'd be distracted from
> > fixing the bugs we need fixed in J.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Michael
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 9:08 PM, Day, Phil <philip.day at hp.com> wrote:
> >> Hi Michael,
> >>
> >> Not sure I understand the need for a gap between "Juno Spec approval
> freeze" (Jul 10th) and "K opens for spec proposals" (Sep 4th).    I can
> understand that K specs won't get approved in that period, and may not get
> much feedback from the cores - but I don't see the harm in letting specs be
> submitted to the K directory for early review / feedback during that period
> ?
>
> I agree with both of you.  Priorities need to be finishing up J, but I
> don't see any reason not to let people post K specs whenever.
> Expectations just need to be set appropriately that it may be a while
> before they get reviewed/approved.
>

No, we need more discipline around bug fixing and also to reserve time for
docs.

Anne


>
> --
> Russell Bryant
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20140624/3724bf45/attachment.html>