Open Stack

I will probably be unable, as usual, to attend today's CI meeting (falls
right around my dinner time).
I think it's a good idea to starting keeping track of the status of the
various CI systems, but I feel the etherpad will not work very well in the
long term.

However, it would be great if we could start devising a solution for having
"health" reports from the various CI systems.
This report should report the following kind of information:
- timestamp of last run
- timestamp of last vote (a system might start job which then get aborted
for CI infra problems)
- % of success vs failures (not sure how important is that one but provides
a metric of comparison with upstream jenkins)
- % of disagreements with jenkins (this might allow us to quickly spot
those CI systems which are randomly -1'ing patches)

The percentage metrics might be taken over a 48 hours or 7 days interval,
or both.
Does this idea sound reasonable?

Also, regarding [1]. I agree that more is always better...  but I would
like a minimum required set of tests to be enforced.
Is this something that can be achieved?

Salvatore

[1] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/NeutronThirdPartyTesting




On 16 June 2014 07:07, YAMAMOTO Takashi <yamamoto at valinux.co.jp> wrote:

> hi,
>
> > My initial analysis of Neutron 3rd Party CI is here [1]. This was
> > somewhat correlated with information from DriverLog [2], which was
> > helpful to put this together.
>
> i updated the etherpad for ofagent.
> currently a single CI system is running tests for both of ofagent and ryu.
> is it ok?
>
> YAMAMOTO Takashi
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20140616/ff1b5ea7/attachment.html>