[openstack-dev] [neutron] [third-party] Current status of Neutron 3rd Party CI and how to move forward

Kyle Mestery mestery at noironetworks.com
Mon Jun 16 13:58:10 UTC 2014


On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 8:52 AM, Salvatore Orlando <sorlando at nicira.com> wrote:
> I will probably be unable, as usual, to attend today's CI meeting (falls
> right around my dinner time).
> I think it's a good idea to starting keeping track of the status of the
> various CI systems, but I feel the etherpad will not work very well in the
> long term.
>
Agreed. The etherpad was a starting point, I'll move this information
to a wiki page later today.

> However, it would be great if we could start devising a solution for having
> "health" reports from the various CI systems.
> This report should report the following kind of information:
> - timestamp of last run
> - timestamp of last vote (a system might start job which then get aborted
> for CI infra problems)
> - % of success vs failures (not sure how important is that one but provides
> a metric of comparison with upstream jenkins)
> - % of disagreements with jenkins (this might allow us to quickly spot those
> CI systems which are randomly -1'ing patches)
>
> The percentage metrics might be taken over a 48 hours or 7 days interval, or
> both.
> Does this idea sound reasonable?
>
This sounds like a very good idea. Now we just need to find someone
with the time to write this. :)

> Also, regarding [1]. I agree that more is always better...  but I would like
> a minimum required set of tests to be enforced.
> Is this something that can be achieved?
>
I think the tests that are in there are the minimum tests I'd like to
see run. I'll clarify the language on the wiki page a bit.

> Salvatore
>
> [1] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/NeutronThirdPartyTesting
>
>
>
>
> On 16 June 2014 07:07, YAMAMOTO Takashi <yamamoto at valinux.co.jp> wrote:
>>
>> hi,
>>
>> > My initial analysis of Neutron 3rd Party CI is here [1]. This was
>> > somewhat correlated with information from DriverLog [2], which was
>> > helpful to put this together.
>>
>> i updated the etherpad for ofagent.
>> currently a single CI system is running tests for both of ofagent and ryu.
>> is it ok?
>>
>> YAMAMOTO Takashi
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>



More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list