Open Stack

Oh sorry... I thought it was about Ironic not TripleO (morning issues)

Anyway, it could be something that we could adopt in Ironic as well :)

On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 9:40 AM, Lucas Alvares Gomes
<lucasagomes at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 9:18 PM, Jay Dobies <jason.dobies at redhat.com> wrote:
>> At the meetup today, the topic of our spec process came up. The general
>> sentiment is that the process is still young and the hiccups are expected,
>> but we do need to get better about making sure we're staying on top of them.
>>
>> As a first step, it was proposed to add 1 spec review a week to the existing
>> 3 reviews per day requirement for cores.
>>
>> Additionally, we're going to start to capture and review the metrics on spec
>> patches specifically during the weekly meeting. That should help bring to
>> light how long reviews are sitting in the queue without being touched.
>>
>> What are everyone's feelings on adding a 1 spec review per week requirement
>> for cores?
>
> You mean cores in Ironic and not the cores in the ironic-spec-core
> group[1] right?
>
> Either way, 1 review per week seems to be very reasonable, the minimum
> you can expect from a core, so +1 for the idea.
>
> [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/admin/groups/352,members