Open Stack

On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 9:18 PM, Jay Dobies <jason.dobies at redhat.com> wrote:
> At the meetup today, the topic of our spec process came up. The general
> sentiment is that the process is still young and the hiccups are expected,
> but we do need to get better about making sure we're staying on top of them.
>
> As a first step, it was proposed to add 1 spec review a week to the existing
> 3 reviews per day requirement for cores.
>
> Additionally, we're going to start to capture and review the metrics on spec
> patches specifically during the weekly meeting. That should help bring to
> light how long reviews are sitting in the queue without being touched.
>
> What are everyone's feelings on adding a 1 spec review per week requirement
> for cores?

You mean cores in Ironic and not the cores in the ironic-spec-core
group[1] right?

Either way, 1 review per week seems to be very reasonable, the minimum
you can expect from a core, so +1 for the idea.

[1] https://review.openstack.org/#/admin/groups/352,members