Open Stack

On 07/22/2014 11:58 AM, David Kranz wrote:
> On 07/22/2014 10:44 AM, Sean Dague wrote:
>> Honestly, I'm really not sure I see this as a different program, but is
>> really something that should be folded into the QA program. I feel like
>> a top level effort like this is going to lead to a lot of duplication in
>> the data analysis that's currently going on, as well as functionality
>> for better load driver UX.
>>
>> 	-Sean
> +1
> It will also lead to pointless discussions/arguments about which
> activities are part of "QA" and which are part of
> "Performance and Scalability Testing".
> 
> QA Program mission:
> 
> " Develop, maintain, and initiate tools and plans to ensure the upstream
> stability and quality of OpenStack, and its release readiness at any
> point during the release cycle."
> 
> It is hard to see how $subj falls outside of that mission. Of course
> rally would continue to have its own repo, review team, etc. as do
> tempest and grenade.

Right, 100% agreed. Rally would remain with it's own repo + review team,
just like grenade.

	-Sean

-- 
Sean Dague
http://dague.net