Agreed. And we should keep records for each release. On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 7:57 PM, Tim Bell <Tim.Bell at cern.ch> wrote: > As we approach Juno-3, a number of specs have been correctly marked as > abandoned since they are not expected to be ready in time for the release. > > > > Is there a mechanism to keep these specs open for discussion even though > there is no expectation that they will be ready for Juno and ‘defer’ them > to ‘K’ ? > > > > It seems a pity to archive the comments and reviewer lists along with > losing a place to continue the discussions even if we are not expecting to > see code in Juno. > > > > Tim > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > -- Best wishes! Baohua -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20140718/4d2a961d/attachment.html>