[openstack-dev] [oslo.messaging][infra] New package dependencies for oslo.messaging's AMQP 1.0 support.
Ken Giusti
kgiusti at gmail.com
Wed Jul 16 14:29:22 UTC 2014
On 07/15/2014 10:58:50 +0200, Flavio Percoco wrote:
>On 07/15/2014 07:16 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 1:03 PM, Ken Giusti <kgiusti at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> These packages may be obtained via EPEL for Centos/RHEL systems
>>> (qpid-proton-c-devel), and via the Qpid project's PPA [3]
>>> (libqpid-proton2-dev) for Debian/Ubuntu. They are also available for
>>> Fedora via the default yum repos. Otherwise, the source can be pulled
>>> directly from the Qpid project and built/installed manually [4].
>>
>> Do you know the timeline for having those added to the Ubuntu cloud
>> archives? I think we try not to add PPAs in devstack, but I'm not sure
>> if that's a hard policy.
>
>IIUC, the package has been accepted in Debian - Ken, correct me if I'm
>wrong. Here's the link to the Debian's mentor page:
>
>http://mentors.debian.net/package/qpid-proton
>
No, it hasn't been accepted yet - it is still pending approval by the
sponsor. That's one of the reasons the Qpid project has set up its
own PPA.
>>
>>>
>>> I'd like to get the blueprint accepted, but I'll have to address these
>>> new dependencies first. What is the best way to get these new
>>> packages into CI, devstack, etc? And will developers be willing to
>>> install the proton development libraries, or can this be done
>>> automagically?
>>
>> To set up integration tests we'll need an option in devstack to set
>> the messaging driver to this new one. That flag should also trigger
>> setting up the dependencies needed. Before you spend time implementing
>> that, though, we should clarify the policy on PPAs.
>
>Agreed. FWIW, the work on devstack is on the works but it's being held
>off while we clarify the policy on PPAs.
More information about the OpenStack-dev
mailing list