Open Stack

Le 16/07/2014 14:09, Daniel P. Berrange a écrit :
> On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 11:57:33AM +0000, Tim Bell wrote:
>> As we approach Juno-3, a number of specs have been correctly marked
>> as abandoned since they are not expected to be ready in time for the
>> release.
>>
>> Is there a mechanism to keep these specs open for discussion even
>> though there is no expectation that they will be ready for Juno
>> and 'defer' them to 'K' ?
>>
>> It seems a pity to archive the comments and reviewer lists along
>> with losing a place to continue the discussions even if we are not
>> expecting to see code in Juno.
> Agreed, that is sub-optimal to say the least.
>
> The spec documents themselves are in a release specific directory
> though. Any which are to be postponed to Kxxx would need to move
> into a specs/kxxxx directory instead of specs/juno, but we don't
> know what the kxxxx directory needs to be called yet :-(  Assuming
> we determine the directory name, then IMHO any spec could just be
> restored placing the spec into the new directory for Kxxxx.
>
> Regards,
> Daniel


I'm just thinking about the opportunity of creating a 'next' directory
in addition to the juno and Kxxx dirs, so that the logic would be the
same as for Launchpad.
That would also mean that a spec could be merged with target set to
'next', which is not a non-sense but just means the idea is validated,
without having determined a release date yet.

Thoughts ?

-Sylvain