Open Stack

Active discussion at the gantt meeting this week, check out the log:

	http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/gantt/2014/gantt.2014-07-01-15.00.log.html


--
Don Dugger
"Censeo Toto nos in Kansa esse decisse." - D. Gale
Ph: 303/443-3786

-----Original Message-----
From: Russell Bryant [mailto:rbryant at redhat.com] 
Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2014 7:48 AM
To: openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] [Gantt] Scheduler split status (updated)

On 07/10/2014 05:06 AM, Sylvain Bauza wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> ===
> tl;dr: Now that we agree on waiting for the split prereqs to be done, 
> we debate on if ResourceTracker should be part of the scheduler code 
> and consequently Scheduler should expose ResourceTracker APIs so that 
> Nova wouldn't own compute nodes resources. I'm proposing to first come 
> with RT as Nova resource in Juno and move ResourceTracker in Scheduler 
> for K, so we at least merge some patches by Juno.
> ===
> 
> Some debates occured recently about the scheduler split, so I think 
> it's important to loop back with you all to see where we are and what 
> are the discussions.
> Again, feel free to express your opinions, they are welcome.

Where did this resource tracker discussion come up?  Do you have any references that I can read to catch up on it?  I would like to see more detail on the proposal for what should stay in Nova vs. be moved.  What is the interface between Nova and the scheduler here?

--
Russell Bryant

_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev