Open Stack

On 07/10/2014 05:06 AM, Sylvain Bauza wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> ===
> tl;dr: Now that we agree on waiting for the split prereqs to be done, we
> debate on if ResourceTracker should be part of the scheduler code and
> consequently Scheduler should expose ResourceTracker APIs so that Nova
> wouldn't own compute nodes resources. I'm proposing to first come with
> RT as Nova resource in Juno and move ResourceTracker in Scheduler for K,
> so we at least merge some patches by Juno.
> ===
> 
> Some debates occured recently about the scheduler split, so I think it's
> important to loop back with you all to see where we are and what are the
> discussions.
> Again, feel free to express your opinions, they are welcome.

Where did this resource tracker discussion come up?  Do you have any
references that I can read to catch up on it?  I would like to see more
detail on the proposal for what should stay in Nova vs. be moved.  What
is the interface between Nova and the scheduler here?

-- 
Russell Bryant