Open Stack

Hello!

I've been looking at the statistics, and doing a bit of review of the
reviewers, and I think we have an opportunity to expand the core reviewer
team in TripleO. We absolutely need the help, and I think these two
individuals are well positioned to do that.

I would like to draw your attention to this page:

http://russellbryant.net/openstack-stats/tripleo-reviewers-90.txt

Specifically these two lines:

+-------------------+---------------------------------------+----------------+
|      Reviewer     | Reviews   -2  -1  +1  +2  +A    +/- % | Disagreements* |
+-------------------+---------------------------------------+----------------+
|  jonpaul-sullivan |     188    0  43 145   0   0    77.1% |   28 ( 14.9%)  |
|       lxsli       |     186    0  23 163   0   0    87.6% |   27 ( 14.5%)  |

Note that they are right at the level we expect, 3 per work day. And
I've looked through their reviews and code contributions: it is clear
that they understand what we're trying to do in TripleO, and how it all
works. I am a little dismayed at the slightly high disagreement rate,
but looking through the disagreements, most of them were jp and lxsli
being more demanding of submitters, so I am less dismayed.

So, I propose that we add jonpaul-sullivan and lxsli to the TripleO core
reviewer team.