[openstack-dev] [cinder] 3rd party ci names for use by official cinder mandated tests

Asselin, Ramy ramy.asselin at hp.com
Tue Jul 1 17:13:06 UTC 2014

3rd party ci names is currently becoming a bit controversial for what we're trying to do in cinder: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/101013/
The motivation for the above change is to aid developers understand what the 3rd party ci systems are testing in order to avoid confusion.
The goal is to aid developers reviewing cinder changes to understand which 3rd party ci systems are running official cinder-mandated tests and which are running unofficial/proprietary tests.
Since the use of "cinder" is proposed to be "reserved" (per change under review above), I'd like to propose the following for Cinder third-party names under the following conditions:
*         This CI account name is to be used strictly for official cinder-defined dsvm-full-{driver} tests.
*         No additional tests allowed on this account.
o    A different account name will be used for unofficial / proprietary tests.
*         Account will only post reviews to cinder patches.
o    A different account name will be used to post reviews in all other projects.
*         Format of comments will be (as jgriffith commented in that review):

{company name}-cinder-ci

   dsvm-full-{driver-name}                           pass/fail

   dsvm-full-{other-driver-name}                 pass/fail

   dsvm-full-{yet-another-driver-name}       pass/fail


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20140701/49c21f25/attachment-0001.html>

More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list