Open Stack

@flwang, np at all. We can put the input in bug report as a comment or
here anyway,
as far as it can let us/me know the gains/advantages on this "fix".

I'd like to know whether there is a backward-compatibility issue, but seems
it's not a big deal? To keep the image property be case-sensitive is make
sense, at last it is better if we keep same property name as client
provided.

zhiyan

On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 11:54 AM, Fei Long Wang <flwang at cn.ibm.com> wrote:

> Zhi Yan,
>
> I think you're talking about backward-compatibility, right? I would say
> it's possible, just like the v2 is not compatible with v1 against this. So
> that's why I would like to see a bug is opened to track this and then we
> get also some comments from the end user/product manager perspective to
> decide to mark it as won't fix or go ahead.
>
> Thanks & Best regards,
> Fei Long Wang (王飞龙)
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Tech Lead of Nitrogen (SME team)
> Cloud Solutions and OpenStack Development
> Tel: 8610-82450513 | T/L: 905-0513
> Email: flwang at cn.ibm.com
> China Systems & Technology Laboratory in Beijing
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> [image: Inactive hide details for Zhi Yan Liu ---01/27/2014 01:02:40
> AM---One quick question, do you think there is a potential backwar]Zhi
> Yan Liu ---01/27/2014 01:02:40 AM---One quick question, do you think there
> is a potential backward-capability breaking issue for end use
>
> From: Zhi Yan Liu <lzy.dev at gmail.com>
> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" <
> openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>,
> Cc: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" <
> openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
> Date: 01/27/2014 01:02 AM
>
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [glance]A question abount the
> x-image-meta-property parameter.
> ------------------------------
>
>
>
> One quick question, do you think there is a potential backward-capability
> breaking issue for end user or ISV if we remove existing
> standardizing/normalizing logic? I'd like to know the gains/advantages on
> this "fix".
>
> thanks,
> zhiyan
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
> On 2014年1月26日, at 23:49, Fei Long Wang <*flwang at cn.ibm.com*<flwang at cn.ibm.com>>
> wrote:
>
>
>    Hey Jay, thanks for calling my name correctly :)
>
>    Wang Hong, feel free to open a bug to track this. And we can get more
>    info/comments when the patch is reviewed. Thanks.
>
>
>    Thanks & Best regards,
>    Fei Long Wang (王飞龙)
>    ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>    Tech Lead of Nitrogen (SME team)
>    Cloud Solutions and OpenStack Development
>    Tel: 8610-82450513 | T/L: 905-0513
>    Email: *flwang at cn.ibm.com* <flwang at cn.ibm.com>
>    China Systems & Technology Laboratory in Beijing
>    ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>    <graycol.gif>Jay Pipes ---01/26/2014 11:20:40 PM---On Sun, 2014-01-26
>    at 18:48 +0800, Fei Long Wang wrote: > Hi Wang Hong,
>
>    From: Jay Pipes <*jaypipes at gmail.com* <jaypipes at gmail.com>>
>    To: Fei Long Wang/China/IBM at IBMCN,
>    Cc: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" <
>    *openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org* <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
>    >
>    Date: 01/26/2014 11:20 PM
>    Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [glance]A question abount the
>    x-image-meta-property parameter.
>
>    ------------------------------
>
>
>
>    On Sun, 2014-01-26 at 18:48 +0800, Fei Long Wang wrote:
>    > Hi Wang Hong,
>    >
>    > Good catch. I think the issue is caused by line 244-246, see
>    >
>    *https://github.com/openstack/glance/blob/master/glance/common/utils.py#L244*<https://github.com/openstack/glance/blob/master/glance/common/utils.py#L244> For
>    the case-matter issue, I think it's a bug. But as for the - to _, I would
>    like to listen Jay's opinion since who is the original author. And
>    obviously, it's intentional change.
>
>    Hi Wang Hong adnd Fei Long,
>
>    It's been a long time since I wrote that :) To be honest, I'm not sure
>    why -- other than just standardizing/normalizing the input, we did
>    that.
>    Perhaps it had something to do with vendor-specific properties that had
>    a prefix that used hyphens, but I'm really not sure... perhaps I am
>    getting too old :)
>
>    Best,
>    -jay
>
>    > Inactive hide details for 王宏 ---01/26/2014 05:14:02 PM---Hi all. If
>    > I use the following command to create an image:王宏 ---01/26/2014
>    > 05:14:02 PM---Hi all. If I use the following command to create an
>    > image:
>    >
>    > From: 王宏 <*w.wanghong1 at gmail.com* <w.wanghong1 at gmail.com>>
>    > To: *openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org*<openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>,
>
>    > Date: 01/26/2014 05:14 PM
>    > Subject: [openstack-dev] [glance]A question abount the
>    > x-image-meta-property parameter.
>    >
>    >
>    >
>    >
>    ______________________________________________________________________
>    >
>    >
>    >
>    > Hi all.
>    >
>    > If I use the following command to create an image:
>    > curl -i -H "X-Auth-Token:268c536db05b435bb6e631158744e3f6" -H
>    > "x-image-meta-property-IMAGE-TYPE:xxx" -H "x-image-meta-name:test" -X
>    > POST *http://127.0.0.1:9292/v1/images*<http://127.0.0.1:9292/v1/images>
>    >
>    > I will get the following results:
>    > {"image": {"status": "queued", "deleted": false, "container_format":
>    > null, "min_ram": 0, "updated_at": "2014-01-26T08:51:54", "owner":
>    > "9a38c1cda5344dd288331b988739c834", "min_disk": 0, "is_public":
>    false,
>    > "deleted_at": null, "id": "696ab97d-0e6f-46f1-8570-b6db707a748b",
>    > "size": 0, "name": "test", "checksum": null, "created_at":
>    > "2014-01-26T08:51:54", "disk_format": null, "properties":
>    > {"image_type": "xxx"}, "protected": false}}
>    >
>    > The capital letters in the property will be converted to lowercase
>    > letters and "-" will be converted to "_"("IMAGE-TYPE"=>"image_type").
>    >
>    > Is it a bug? Thanks.
>    >
>    > Best regards.
>    > wanghong_______________________________________________
>    > OpenStack-dev mailing list
>    > *OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org*<OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
>    > *http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev*<http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev>
>    >
>
>
>
>    _______________________________________________
>    OpenStack-dev mailing list
> *OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org* <OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
> *http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev*<http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev>
>    _______________________________________________
>    OpenStack-dev mailing list
>    OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>    http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20140127/65b11a5a/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: graycol.gif
Type: image/gif
Size: 105 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20140127/65b11a5a/attachment.gif>