Open Stack

Zhi Yan,

I think you're talking about backward-compatibility, right? I would say
it's possible, just like the v2 is not compatible with v1 against this. So
that's why I would like to see a bug is opened to track this and then we
get also some comments from the end user/product manager perspective to
decide to mark it as won't fix or go ahead.

Thanks & Best regards,
Fei Long Wang (王飞龙)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Tech Lead of Nitrogen (SME team)
Cloud Solutions and OpenStack Development
Tel: 8610-82450513 | T/L: 905-0513
Email: flwang at cn.ibm.com
China Systems & Technology Laboratory in Beijing
---------------------------------------------------------------------




From:	Zhi Yan Liu <lzy.dev at gmail.com>
To:	"OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
            <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>,
Cc:	"OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
            <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
Date:	01/27/2014 01:02 AM
Subject:	Re: [openstack-dev] [glance]A question abount the
            x-image-meta-property parameter.



One quick question, do you think there is a potential backward-capability
breaking issue for end user or ISV if we remove existing
standardizing/normalizing logic? I'd like to know the gains/advantages on
this "fix".

thanks,
zhiyan

Sent from my iPad

On 2014年1月26日, at 23:49, Fei Long Wang <flwang at cn.ibm.com> wrote:



      Hey Jay, thanks for calling my name correctly :)

      Wang Hong, feel free to open a bug to track this. And we can get more
      info/comments when the patch is reviewed. Thanks.


      Thanks & Best regards,
      Fei Long Wang (王飞龙)
      ---------------------------------------------------------------------
      Tech Lead of Nitrogen (SME team)
      Cloud Solutions and OpenStack Development
      Tel: 8610-82450513 | T/L: 905-0513
      Email: flwang at cn.ibm.com
      China Systems & Technology Laboratory in Beijing
      ---------------------------------------------------------------------


      <graycol.gif>Jay Pipes ---01/26/2014 11:20:40 PM---On Sun, 2014-01-26
      at 18:48 +0800, Fei Long Wang wrote: > Hi Wang Hong,

      From: Jay Pipes <jaypipes at gmail.com>
      To: Fei Long Wang/China/IBM at IBMCN,
      Cc: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" <
      openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
      Date: 01/26/2014 11:20 PM
      Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [glance]A question abount the
      x-image-meta-property parameter.





      On Sun, 2014-01-26 at 18:48 +0800, Fei Long Wang wrote:
      > Hi Wang Hong,
      >
      > Good catch. I think the issue is caused by line 244-246, see
      >
      https://github.com/openstack/glance/blob/master/glance/common/utils.py#L244
       For the case-matter issue, I think it's a bug. But as for the - to
      _, I would like to listen Jay's opinion since who is the original
      author. And obviously, it's intentional change.

      Hi Wang Hong adnd Fei Long,

      It's been a long time since I wrote that :) To be honest, I'm not
      sure
      why -- other than just standardizing/normalizing the input, we did
      that.
      Perhaps it had something to do with vendor-specific properties that
      had
      a prefix that used hyphens, but I'm really not sure... perhaps I am
      getting too old :)

      Best,
      -jay

      > Inactive hide details for 王宏 ---01/26/2014 05:14:02 PM---Hi all.
      If
      > I use the following command to create an image:王宏 ---01/26/2014
      > 05:14:02 PM---Hi all. If I use the following command to create an
      > image:
      >
      > From: 王宏 <w.wanghong1 at gmail.com>
      > To: openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org,
      > Date: 01/26/2014 05:14 PM
      > Subject: [openstack-dev] [glance]A question abount the
      > x-image-meta-property parameter.
      >
      >
      >
      >
      ______________________________________________________________________

      >
      >
      >
      > Hi all.
      >
      > If I use the following command to create an image:
      > curl -i -H "X-Auth-Token:268c536db05b435bb6e631158744e3f6" -H
      > "x-image-meta-property-IMAGE-TYPE:xxx" -H "x-image-meta-name:test"
      -X
      > POST http://127.0.0.1:9292/v1/images
      >
      > I will get the following results:
      > {"image": {"status": "queued", "deleted": false,
      "container_format":
      > null, "min_ram": 0, "updated_at": "2014-01-26T08:51:54", "owner":
      > "9a38c1cda5344dd288331b988739c834", "min_disk": 0, "is_public":
      false,
      > "deleted_at": null, "id": "696ab97d-0e6f-46f1-8570-b6db707a748b",
      > "size": 0, "name": "test", "checksum": null, "created_at":
      > "2014-01-26T08:51:54", "disk_format": null, "properties":
      > {"image_type": "xxx"}, "protected": false}}
      >
      > The capital letters in the property will be converted to lowercase
      > letters and "-" will be converted to
      "_"("IMAGE-TYPE"=>"image_type").
      >
      > Is it a bug? Thanks.
      >
      > Best regards.
      > wanghong_______________________________________________
      > OpenStack-dev mailing list
      > OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
      > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
      >



      _______________________________________________
      OpenStack-dev mailing list
      OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
      http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
      _______________________________________________
      OpenStack-dev mailing list
      OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
      http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20140127/03660919/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: graycol.gif
Type: image/gif
Size: 105 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20140127/03660919/attachment.gif>