Open Stack

>
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 12:54 PM, Sergey Skripnick  
> <sskripnick at mirantis.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>>
>>> I appreciate that we want to fix the ssh client. I'm not certain that  
>>> writing our own is the >>>best >answer.
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> I was supposed to fix oslo.processutils.ssh with this class, but it may
>>
>> be fixed without it, not big deal.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> In his comments on your pull request, the paramiko author recommended  
>>> looking at Fabric. I know >>>that >Fabric has a long history in  
>>> production. Does it provide the required features?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Fabric is too much for just command execution on remote server. Spur  
>> seems like
>>
>> good choice for this.
>>
>>
>>
>> But I still don't understand: why do we need oslo.processutils.execute?  
>> We can use
>>
>> subprocess module. Why do we need oslo.processutils.ssh_execute? We can  
>> use paramiko
>>
>> instead.
>
> Well, as you've shown, having a wrapper around subprocess to deal with  
> the I/O properly is useful, >especially commands that produce a lot of  
> it. :-)
>
>
> As far as ssh_execute goes, I don't know the origin but I imagine the  
> author didn't know about >paramiko.
>
>
> Doug


ssh_execute is using paramiko :)



-- 
Regards,
Sergey Skripnick