Open Stack

On 09/01/14 14:13, Derek Higgins wrote:
> It looks like we have some duplication and inconsistencies on the 3
> os-*-config elements in the tripleo repositories
>
> os-apply-config (duplication) :
>     We have two elements that install this
>       diskimage-builder/elements/config-applier/
>       tripleo-image-elements/elements/os-apply-config/
>
>     As far as I can tell the version in diskimage-builder isn't used by
> tripleo and the upstart file is broke
> ./dmesg:[   13.336184] init: Failed to spawn config-applier main
> process: unable to execute: No such file or directory
>
>     To avoid confusion I propose we remove
> diskimage-builder/elements/config-applier/ (or deprecated if we have a
> suitable process) but would like to call it out here first to see if
> anybody is using it or thinks its a bad idea?
>
> inconsistencies
>    os-collect-config, os-refresh-config : these are both installed from
> git into the global site-packages
>    os-apply-config : installed from a released tarball into its own venv
>
>    To be consistent with the other elements all 3 I think should be
> installed from git into its own venv, thoughts?

I've no insight into why things are the way they are, but your 
suggestions make sense to me.

>
> If no objections I'll go ahead an do this next week,
>
> thanks,
> Derek.
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>