On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 10:43 AM, Eric Windisch <ewindisch at docker.com> wrote: > >> >>> About spur: spur is looks ok, but it a bit complicated inside (it uses >>> separate threads for non-blocking stdin/stderr reading [1]) and I don't >>> know how it would work with eventlet. >>> >> >> That does sound like it might cause issues. What would we need to do to >> test it? >> > > Looking at the code, I don't expect it to be an issue. The monkey-patching > will cause eventlet.spawn to be called for threading.Thread. The code looks > eventlet-friendly enough on the surface. Error handing around file > read/write could be affected, but it also looks fine. > Thanks for that analysis Eric. Is there any reason for us to prefer one approach over the other, then? Doug > > > -- > Regards, > Eric Windisch > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20140108/fc91bbe9/attachment.html>