Open Stack

Hi Sebastian,

Nobody is forgetting this topic, especially me :) We're going to dedicate
an engineer to do some research on topic based on Ryan's comments and my
old pull request on Nailgun with Pecan. The only thing is that it's not
very high priority topic in our roadmap. Don't worry, I'm sure we'll get to
it already in January.
30 Дек 2014 г. 15:25 пользователь "Sebastian Kalinowski" <
skalinowski at mirantis.com> написал:

> Hello all,
>
> What is the current situation with choosing web framework? Was there any
> progress in the topic? I would like to avoid forgetting about it.
>
> 2014-12-08 15:47 GMT+01:00 Ryan Petrello <ryan.petrello at dreamhost.com>:
>
>> Feel free to ask any questions you have in #pecanpy on IRC;  I can answer
>> a lot
>> more quickly than researching docs, and if you have a special need, I can
>> usually accommodate with changes to Pecan (I've done so with several
>> OpenStack
>> projects in the past).
>> On 12/08/14 02:10 PM, Nikolay Markov wrote:
>> > > Yes, and it's been 4 days since last message in this thread and no
>> > > objections, so it seems
>> > > that Pecan in now our framework-of-choice for Nailgun and future
>> > > apps/projects.
>> >
>> > We still need some research to do about technical issues and how easy
>> > we can move to Pecan. Thanks to Ryan, we now have multiple links to
>> > solutions and docs on discussed issues. I guess we'll dedicate some
>> > engineer(s) responsible for doing such a research and then make all
>> > our decisions on subject.
>> >
>> > On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 11:07 AM, Sebastian Kalinowski
>> > <skalinowski at mirantis.com> wrote:
>> > > 2014-12-04 14:01 GMT+01:00 Igor Kalnitsky <ikalnitsky at mirantis.com>:
>> > >>
>> > >> Ok, guys,
>> > >>
>> > >> It became obvious that most of us either vote for Pecan or abstain
>> from
>> > >> voting.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > Yes, and it's been 4 days since last message in this thread and no
>> > > objections, so it seems
>> > > that Pecan in now our framework-of-choice for Nailgun and future
>> > > apps/projects.
>> > >
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >> So I propose to stop fighting this battle (Flask vs Pecan) and start
>> > >> thinking about moving to Pecan. You know, there are many questions
>> > >> that need to be discussed (such as 'should we change API version' or
>> > >> 'should be it done iteratively or as one patchset').
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > IMHO small, iterative changes are rather obvious.
>> > > For other questions maybe we need (draft of ) a blueprint and a
>> separate
>> > > mail thread?
>> > >
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >> - Igor
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > _______________________________________________
>> > > OpenStack-dev mailing list
>> > > OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>> > > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Best regards,
>> > Nick Markov
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > OpenStack-dev mailing list
>> > OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>> --
>> Ryan Petrello
>> Senior Developer, DreamHost
>> ryan.petrello at dreamhost.com
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20141230/e0076082/attachment.html>