[openstack-dev] [Fuel][Nailgun] Web framework

Sebastian Kalinowski skalinowski at mirantis.com
Tue Dec 30 11:22:15 UTC 2014


Hello all,

What is the current situation with choosing web framework? Was there any
progress in the topic? I would like to avoid forgetting about it.

2014-12-08 15:47 GMT+01:00 Ryan Petrello <ryan.petrello at dreamhost.com>:

> Feel free to ask any questions you have in #pecanpy on IRC;  I can answer
> a lot
> more quickly than researching docs, and if you have a special need, I can
> usually accommodate with changes to Pecan (I've done so with several
> OpenStack
> projects in the past).
> On 12/08/14 02:10 PM, Nikolay Markov wrote:
> > > Yes, and it's been 4 days since last message in this thread and no
> > > objections, so it seems
> > > that Pecan in now our framework-of-choice for Nailgun and future
> > > apps/projects.
> >
> > We still need some research to do about technical issues and how easy
> > we can move to Pecan. Thanks to Ryan, we now have multiple links to
> > solutions and docs on discussed issues. I guess we'll dedicate some
> > engineer(s) responsible for doing such a research and then make all
> > our decisions on subject.
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 11:07 AM, Sebastian Kalinowski
> > <skalinowski at mirantis.com> wrote:
> > > 2014-12-04 14:01 GMT+01:00 Igor Kalnitsky <ikalnitsky at mirantis.com>:
> > >>
> > >> Ok, guys,
> > >>
> > >> It became obvious that most of us either vote for Pecan or abstain
> from
> > >> voting.
> > >
> > >
> > > Yes, and it's been 4 days since last message in this thread and no
> > > objections, so it seems
> > > that Pecan in now our framework-of-choice for Nailgun and future
> > > apps/projects.
> > >
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> So I propose to stop fighting this battle (Flask vs Pecan) and start
> > >> thinking about moving to Pecan. You know, there are many questions
> > >> that need to be discussed (such as 'should we change API version' or
> > >> 'should be it done iteratively or as one patchset').
> > >
> > >
> > > IMHO small, iterative changes are rather obvious.
> > > For other questions maybe we need (draft of ) a blueprint and a
> separate
> > > mail thread?
> > >
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> - Igor
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > OpenStack-dev mailing list
> > > OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> > > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Best regards,
> > Nick Markov
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > OpenStack-dev mailing list
> > OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
> --
> Ryan Petrello
> Senior Developer, DreamHost
> ryan.petrello at dreamhost.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20141230/d3faca4a/attachment.html>


More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list