Open Stack

On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 11:51 AM, Eichberger, German
<german.eichberger at hp.com> wrote:
> Kyle,
>
> I am confused. So basically you (and Mark) are saying:
>
> 1) We deprecate Neutron LBaaS v1
> 2) We spin out Neutron LBaaS v2 into it's own project in stackforge
> 3) Users don't have an OpenStack LBaaS any longer until we graduate from OpenStack incubation (as opposed Neutron incubation)
>
> I am hoping you can clarify how this will be shaping up -
>
I think what is needed is this:

1) We incubate Neutron LBaaS V2 in the incubator.
2) It graduates into a project under the networking program.
3) We deprecate Neutron LBaaS v1.

To deprecate, we need the new API stable and ready, and then once V1
is deprecated it takes 2 cycles for us to remove it.

Hope that helps!

Thanks,
Kyle

> Thanks,
> German
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kyle Mestery [mailto:mestery at mestery.com]
> Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2014 6:48 PM
> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][lbaas][octavia]
>
> On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 5:55 PM, Kevin Benton <blak111 at gmail.com> wrote:
>> I think we need some clarification here too about the difference
>> between the general OpenStack Incubation and the Neutron incubation.
>> From my understanding, the Neutron incubation isn't the path to a
>> separate project and independence from Neutron. It's a process to get
>> into Neutron. So if you want to keep it as a separate project with its
>> own cores and a PTL, Neutron incubation would not be the way to go.
>
> That's not true, there are 3 ways out of incubation: 1) The project withers and dies on it's own. 2) The project is spun back into Neutron. 3) The project is spun out into it's own project.
>
> However, it's worth noting that if the project is spun out into it's own entity, it would have to go through incubation to become a fully functioning OpenStack project of it's own.
>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 3:04 PM, Susanne Balle <sleipnir012 at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Just for us to learn about the incubator status, here are some of the
>>> info on incubation:
>>>
>>> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Governance/Approved/Incubation
>>> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Governance/NewProjects
>>>
>>> Susanne
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 5:57 PM, Susanne Balle
>>> <sleipnir012 at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>  I would like to discuss the pros and cons of putting Octavia into
>>>> the Neutron LBaaS incubator project right away. If it is going to be
>>>> the reference implementation for LBaaS v 2 then I believe Octavia
>>>> belong in Neutron LBaaS v2 incubator.
>>>>
>>>> The Pros:
>>>> * Octavia is in Openstack incubation right away along with the lbaas
>>>> v2 code. We do not have to apply for incubation later on.
>>>> * As incubation project we have our own core and should be able ot
>>>> commit our code
>>>> * We are starting out as an OpenStack incubated project
>>>>
>>>> The Cons:
>>>> * Not sure of the velocity of the project
>>>> * Incubation not well defined.
>>>>
>>>> If Octavia starts as a standalone stackforge project we are assuming
>>>> that it would be looked favorable on when time is to move it into
>>>> incubated status.
>>>>
>>>> Susanne
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>>> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Kevin Benton
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev