Open Stack

Hi,

Hmm.. I think ~15 minutes isn't long enough to skip this approach in production.
What about using lrzip only for end-users, but keep regular tarball
for CI and internal usage?

Thanks,
Igor

On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 5:22 PM, Dmitry Pyzhov <dpyzhov at mirantis.com> wrote:
> I see no other quick solutions in 5.1. We can find the difference in
> packages between 5.0 and 5.0.2, put only updated packages in tarball and get
> missed packages from existing repos on master node.
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 5:55 PM, Mike Scherbakov <mscherbakov at mirantis.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> What are other possible solutions to this issue?
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 5:50 PM, Dmitry Pyzhov <dpyzhov at mirantis.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Fuelers,
>>>
>>> Our upgrade tarball for 5.1 is more than 4.5Gb. We can reduce it size by
>>> 2Gb with lrzip tool (ticket, change in build system, change in docs), but it
>>> will dramatically increase unpacking time. I've run unpack on my virtualbox
>>> environment and got this result:
>>> [root at fuel var]# lrzuntar fuel-5.1-upgrade.tar.lrz
>>> Decompressing...
>>> 100%    7637.48 /   7637.48 MB
>>> Average DeCompression Speed:  8.014MB/s
>>> [OK] - 8008478720 bytes
>>> Total time: 00:15:52.93
>>>
>>> My suggestion is to reject this change, release 5.1 with big tarball and
>>> find another solution in next release. Any objections?
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>>> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Mike Scherbakov
>> #mihgen
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>