Open Stack

On 19/08/14 20:58, Gregory Haynes wrote:
> Excerpts from Giulio Fidente's message of 2014-08-19 12:07:53 +0000:
>> One last comment, maybe a bit OT but I'm raising it here to see what is 
>> the other people opinion: how about we modify the -ha job so that at 
>> some point we actually kill one of the controllers and spawn a second 
>> user image?
> 
> I think this is a great long term goal, but IMO performing an update
> isnt really the type of verification we want for this kind of test. We
> really should have some minimal tempest testing in place first so we can
> verify that when these types of failures occur our cloud remains in a
> functioning state.

Greg, you said "performing an update" did you mean "killing a controller
node" ?

if so I agree, verifying our cloud is still in a working order with
tempest would get us more coverage then spawning a node. So once we have
tempest in place we can add a test to kill a controller node.


> 
> - Greg
> 
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>