Open Stack

Thiago,

My old setup was dual-stacked, simply using a flat linuxbridge. It's
just that I now realy would like to separate multiple tenants using L3
routers, which should be easy (dual stacked) to achieve once Dane's work
is completed.

Did you find the time to commit those required changes for that yet Dane?

Regards,
Harm

op 16-08-14 23:33, Martinx - ????? schreef:
> Guys,
>
> Just for the record, I'm using IceHouse in a Dual-Stacked environment
> (with security groups working) but, Instance's IPv6 address are static
> (no upstream SLAAC, arrived in Juno-2, I think) and the topology is
> `VLAN Provider Networks`, no Neutron L3 Router. Where each VLAN have
> v4/v6 addrs, same upstream router (also dual-stacked - still no radvd
> enabled).
>
> Looking forward to start testing L3 + IPv6 in K...
>
> Best,
> Thiago
>
>
> On 16 August 2014 16:21, Harm Weites <harm at weites.com
> <mailto:harm at weites.com>> wrote:
>
>     Hi Dane,
>
>     Thanks, that looks promising. Once support for multiple v6
>     addresses on
>     gateway ports is added I'll be happy to give this a go. Should it work
>     just fine with an otherwise Icehouse based deployment?
>
>     Regards,
>     Harm
>
>     op 16-08-14 20:31, Dane Leblanc (leblancd) schreef:
>     > Hi Harm:
>     >
>     > Can you take a look at the following, which should address this:
>     >   
>      https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/multiple-ipv6-prefixes
>     >
>     > There are some diffs out for review for this blueprint:
>     >    https://review.openstack.org/#/c/113339/
>     > but the change to support 1 V4 + multiple V6 addresses on a
>     gateway port hasn't been added yet. I should be adding this soon.
>     >
>     > There was a request for a Juno feature freeze exception for this
>     blueprint, but there's been no response, so this may not get
>     approved until K release.
>     >
>     > -Dane
>     >
>     > -----Original Message-----
>     > From: Harm Weites [mailto:harm at weites.com <mailto:harm at weites.com>]
>     > Sent: Saturday, August 16, 2014 2:22 PM
>     > To: openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>     <mailto:openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
>     > Subject: [openstack-dev] Status of Neutron IPv6 dual stack
>     >
>     > Hi,
>     >
>     > Given the work on [1] has been abandoned, I'm wondering what the
>     current status of going dual stack is. Of course, given Neutron
>     got something like that on it's roadmap.
>     >
>     > The initial BP [2] aimed for Havana and Icehouse, and I'm
>     unaware of something similar to achieve a dual stack network. What
>     are the options, if any? To my knowledge it all comes down to
>     supporting multiple exterior interfaces (networks) on a l3-agent,
>     which is currently limited to just 1: either IP4 or IP6.
>     >
>     > [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/77471/
>     > [2]
>     >
>     https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/allow-multiple-subnets-on-gateway-port
>     >
>     > Regards,
>     > Harm
>     >
>     > _______________________________________________
>     > OpenStack-dev mailing list
>     > OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>     <mailto:OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
>     > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>     >
>     > _______________________________________________
>     > OpenStack-dev mailing list
>     > OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>     <mailto:OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
>     > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     OpenStack-dev mailing list
>     OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>     <mailto:OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
>     http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20140819/7254ed90/attachment.html>