<html>
  <head>
    <meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
      http-equiv="Content-Type">
  </head>
  <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
    Thiago,<br>
    <br>
    My old setup was dual-stacked, simply using a flat linuxbridge. It's
    just that I now realy would like to separate multiple tenants using
    L3 routers, which should be easy (dual stacked) to achieve once
    Dane's work is completed.<br>
    <br>
    Did you find the time to commit those required changes for that yet
    Dane?<br>
    <br>
    Regards,<br>
    Harm<br>
    <br>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">op 16-08-14 23:33, Martinx - ジェームズ
      schreef:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote
cite="mid:CAJSM8J32x9DWuUD+TsO9u+Tg=DZZ7=_OQEptpBAdv4e9ETYQCg@mail.gmail.com"
      type="cite">
      <div dir="ltr">Guys,
        <div><br>
        </div>
        <div>Just for the record, I'm using IceHouse in a Dual-Stacked
          environment (with security groups working) but, Instance's
          IPv6 address are static (no upstream SLAAC, arrived in Juno-2,
          I think) and the topology is `VLAN Provider Networks`, no
          Neutron L3 Router. Where each VLAN have v4/v6 addrs, same
          upstream router (also dual-stacked - still no radvd enabled).</div>
        <div><br>
        </div>
        <div>Looking forward to start testing L3 + IPv6 in K...</div>
        <div><br>
        </div>
        <div>Best,</div>
        <div>Thiago</div>
      </div>
      <div class="gmail_extra"><br>
        <br>
        <div class="gmail_quote">On 16 August 2014 16:21, Harm Weites <span
            dir="ltr"><<a moz-do-not-send="true"
              href="mailto:harm@weites.com" target="_blank">harm@weites.com</a>></span>
          wrote:<br>
          <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
            .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Hi Dane,<br>
            <br>
            Thanks, that looks promising. Once support for multiple v6
            addresses on<br>
            gateway ports is added I'll be happy to give this a go.
            Should it work<br>
            just fine with an otherwise Icehouse based deployment?<br>
            <br>
            Regards,<br>
            Harm<br>
            <br>
            op 16-08-14 20:31, Dane Leblanc (leblancd) schreef:<br>
            <div class="HOEnZb">
              <div class="h5">> Hi Harm:<br>
                ><br>
                > Can you take a look at the following, which should
                address this:<br>
                >     <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/multiple-ipv6-prefixes"
                  target="_blank">https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/multiple-ipv6-prefixes</a><br>
                ><br>
                > There are some diffs out for review for this
                blueprint:<br>
                >    <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                  href="https://review.openstack.org/#/c/113339/"
                  target="_blank">https://review.openstack.org/#/c/113339/</a><br>
                > but the change to support 1 V4 + multiple V6
                addresses on a gateway port hasn't been added yet. I
                should be adding this soon.<br>
                ><br>
                > There was a request for a Juno feature freeze
                exception for this blueprint, but there's been no
                response, so this may not get approved until K release.<br>
                ><br>
                > -Dane<br>
                ><br>
                > -----Original Message-----<br>
                > From: Harm Weites [mailto:<a moz-do-not-send="true"
                  href="mailto:harm@weites.com">harm@weites.com</a>]<br>
                > Sent: Saturday, August 16, 2014 2:22 PM<br>
                > To: <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                  href="mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org">openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org</a><br>
                > Subject: [openstack-dev] Status of Neutron IPv6
                dual stack<br>
                ><br>
                > Hi,<br>
                ><br>
                > Given the work on [1] has been abandoned, I'm
                wondering what the current status of going dual stack
                is. Of course, given Neutron got something like that on
                it's roadmap.<br>
                ><br>
                > The initial BP [2] aimed for Havana and Icehouse,
                and I'm unaware of something similar to achieve a dual
                stack network. What are the options, if any? To my
                knowledge it all comes down to supporting multiple
                exterior interfaces (networks) on a l3-agent, which is
                currently limited to just 1: either IP4 or IP6.<br>
                ><br>
                > [1] <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                  href="https://review.openstack.org/#/c/77471/"
                  target="_blank">https://review.openstack.org/#/c/77471/</a><br>
                > [2]<br>
                > <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/allow-multiple-subnets-on-gateway-port"
                  target="_blank">https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/allow-multiple-subnets-on-gateway-port</a><br>
                ><br>
                > Regards,<br>
                > Harm<br>
                ><br>
                > _______________________________________________<br>
                > OpenStack-dev mailing list<br>
                > <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                  href="mailto:OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org">OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org</a><br>
                > <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                  href="http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev"
                  target="_blank">http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev</a><br>
                ><br>
                > _______________________________________________<br>
                > OpenStack-dev mailing list<br>
                > <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                  href="mailto:OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org">OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org</a><br>
                > <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                  href="http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev"
                  target="_blank">http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev</a><br>
                <br>
                <br>
                _______________________________________________<br>
                OpenStack-dev mailing list<br>
                <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                  href="mailto:OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org">OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org</a><br>
                <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                  href="http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev"
                  target="_blank">http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev</a><br>
              </div>
            </div>
          </blockquote>
        </div>
        <br>
      </div>
      <br>
      <fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
      <br>
      <pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org">OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev">http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev</a>
</pre>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
  </body>
</html>