Open Stack

Dane,

Are you sure about it?
I just went to this commit and I could not find the APIC tests.

Thanks,

Edgar

On 8/17/14, 8:47 PM, "Dane Leblanc (leblancd)" <leblancd at cisco.com> wrote:

>Edgar:
>
>The Cisco APIC should be reporting results for both APIC-related and
>non-APIC related changes now.
>(See http://cisco-neutron-ci.cisco.com/logs/apic/1738/).
>
>Will you be updating the wiki page?
>
>-Dane
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Dane Leblanc (leblancd)
>Sent: Friday, August 15, 2014 8:18 PM
>To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [third-party] What tests are
>required to be run
>
>Also, you can add me as a contact person for the Cisco VPNaaS driver.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Dane Leblanc (leblancd)
>Sent: Friday, August 15, 2014 8:14 PM
>To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>Subject: RE: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [third-party] What tests are
>required to be run
>
>Edgar:
>
>For the Notes for the Cisco APIC, can you change the comment "results are
>fake" to something like "results are only valid for APIC-related
>commits"? I think this more accurately represents our current results
>(for reasons we chatted about on another thread).
>
>Thanks,
>Dane
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Edgar Magana [mailto:edgar.magana at workday.com]
>Sent: Friday, August 15, 2014 6:36 PM
>To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [third-party] What tests are
>required to be run
>Importance: High
>
>Team,
>
>I did a quick audit on the Neutron CI. Very sad results. Only few plugins
>and drivers are running properly and testing all Neutron commits.
>I created a report here:
>https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Neutron_Plugins_and_Drivers#Existing_Plugi
>n
>_and_Drivers
>
>
>We will discuss the actions to take on the next Neutron IRC meeting. So
>please, reach me out to clarify what is the status of your CI.
>I had two commits to quickly verify the CI reliability:
>
>https://review.openstack.org/#/c/114393/
>
>https://review.openstack.org/#/c/40296/
>
>
>I would expect all plugins and drivers passing on the first one and
>failing for the second but I got so many surprises.
>
>Neutron code quality and reliability is a top priority, if you ignore
>this report that plugin/driver will be candidate to be remove from
>Neutron tree.
>
>Cheers,
>
>Edgar
>
>P.s. I hate to be the inquisitor hereŠ but someone has to do the dirty
>job!
>
>
>On 8/14/14, 8:30 AM, "Kyle Mestery" <mestery at mestery.com> wrote:
>
>>Folks, I'm not sure if all CI accounts are running sufficient tests.
>>Per the requirements wiki page here [1], everyone needs to be running
>>more than just Tempest API tests, which I still see most neutron
>>third-party CI setups doing. I'd like to ask everyone who operates a
>>third-party CI account for Neutron to please look at the link below and
>>make sure you are running appropriate tests. If you have questions, the
>>weekly third-party meeting [2] is a great place to ask questions.
>>
>>Thanks,
>>Kyle
>>
>>[1] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/NeutronThirdPartyTesting
>>[2] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/ThirdParty
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>OpenStack-dev mailing list
>>OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>>http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>OpenStack-dev mailing list
>OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>_______________________________________________
>OpenStack-dev mailing list
>OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev