Open Stack

Edgar:

The Cisco APIC should be reporting results for both APIC-related and non-APIC related changes now.
(See http://cisco-neutron-ci.cisco.com/logs/apic/1738/).

Will you be updating the wiki page?

-Dane

-----Original Message-----
From: Dane Leblanc (leblancd) 
Sent: Friday, August 15, 2014 8:18 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [third-party] What tests are required to be run

Also, you can add me as a contact person for the Cisco VPNaaS driver.

-----Original Message-----
From: Dane Leblanc (leblancd)
Sent: Friday, August 15, 2014 8:14 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: RE: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [third-party] What tests are required to be run

Edgar:

For the Notes for the Cisco APIC, can you change the comment "results are fake" to something like "results are only valid for APIC-related commits"? I think this more accurately represents our current results (for reasons we chatted about on another thread).

Thanks,
Dane

-----Original Message-----
From: Edgar Magana [mailto:edgar.magana at workday.com]
Sent: Friday, August 15, 2014 6:36 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [third-party] What tests are required to be run
Importance: High

Team,

I did a quick audit on the Neutron CI. Very sad results. Only few plugins and drivers are running properly and testing all Neutron commits.
I created a report here:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Neutron_Plugins_and_Drivers#Existing_Plugin
_and_Drivers


We will discuss the actions to take on the next Neutron IRC meeting. So please, reach me out to clarify what is the status of your CI.
I had two commits to quickly verify the CI reliability:

https://review.openstack.org/#/c/114393/

https://review.openstack.org/#/c/40296/


I would expect all plugins and drivers passing on the first one and failing for the second but I got so many surprises.

Neutron code quality and reliability is a top priority, if you ignore this report that plugin/driver will be candidate to be remove from Neutron tree.

Cheers,

Edgar

P.s. I hate to be the inquisitor hereŠ but someone has to do the dirty job!


On 8/14/14, 8:30 AM, "Kyle Mestery" <mestery at mestery.com> wrote:

>Folks, I'm not sure if all CI accounts are running sufficient tests.
>Per the requirements wiki page here [1], everyone needs to be running 
>more than just Tempest API tests, which I still see most neutron 
>third-party CI setups doing. I'd like to ask everyone who operates a 
>third-party CI account for Neutron to please look at the link below and 
>make sure you are running appropriate tests. If you have questions, the 
>weekly third-party meeting [2] is a great place to ask questions.
>
>Thanks,
>Kyle
>
>[1] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/NeutronThirdPartyTesting
>[2] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/ThirdParty
>
>_______________________________________________
>OpenStack-dev mailing list
>OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev