[openstack-dev] [neutron] [third-party] What tests are required to be run
Hemanth Ravi
hemanthraviml at gmail.com
Mon Aug 18 19:24:23 UTC 2014
Edgar,
Our CI is running the tests (non voting), but don't see it listed on the
review for any patch. Is this due to missing logs? I would like to confirm
this is the issue, will resolve this.
Thanks,
-hemanth
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 8:35 AM, Edgar Magana <edgar.magana at workday.com>
wrote:
> Thank you Akihiro.
>
> I will propose a better organization for this section. Stay tune!
>
> Edgar
>
> On 8/17/14, 10:53 PM, "Akihiro Motoki" <motoki at da.jp.nec.com> wrote:
>
> >
> >On 2014/08/18 0:12, Kyle Mestery wrote:
> >> On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 5:35 PM, Edgar Magana
> >><edgar.magana at workday.com> wrote:
> >>> Team,
> >>>
> >>> I did a quick audit on the Neutron CI. Very sad results. Only few
> >>>plugins
> >>> and drivers are running properly and testing all Neutron commits.
> >>> I created a report here:
> >>>
> >>>
> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Neutron_Plugins_and_Drivers#Existing_Plu
> >>>gin
> >>> _and_Drivers
> >>>
> >> Can you link this and/or move it to this page:
> >>
> >> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/NeutronPlugins
> >>
> >> This is under the "NeutronPolicies" wiki page which I did at the start
> >> of Juno. This tracks all policies and procedures for Neutron, and
> >> there's a Plugins page (which I linked to above) where this should
> >> land.
> >
> >I just added the link Neutron_Plugins_and_Drivers#Existing_Plugin
> >to NeutronPlugins wiki.
> >
> >The wiki pages NeutronPlugins and Neutron_Plugins_and_Drivers
> >cover the similar contents. According to the history of the page,
> >the latter one was created by Mark at Nov 2013 (beginning of Icehouse
> >cycle).
> >It seems better to merge these two pages to avoid the confusion.
> >
> >Akihiro
> >
> >>
> >>>
> >>> We will discuss the actions to take on the next Neutron IRC meeting. So
> >>> please, reach me out to clarify what is the status of your CI.
> >>> I had two commits to quickly verify the CI reliability:
> >>>
> >>> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/114393/
> >>>
> >>> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/40296/
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> I would expect all plugins and drivers passing on the first one and
> >>> failing for the second but I got so many surprises.
> >>>
> >>> Neutron code quality and reliability is a top priority, if you ignore
> >>>this
> >>> report that plugin/driver will be candidate to be remove from Neutron
> >>>tree.
> >>>
> >>> Cheers,
> >>>
> >>> Edgar
> >>>
> >>> P.s. I hate to be the inquisitor hereŠ but someone has to do the dirty
> >>>job!
> >>>
> >> Thanks for sending this out Edgar and doing this analysis! Can you
> >> please put an agenda item on Monday's meeting to discuss this? I won't
> >> be at the meeting as I'm on PTO (Mark is running the meeting in my
> >> absence), but I'd like the team to discuss this and allow all
> >> third-party people a chance to be there and share their feelings here.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Kyle
> >>
> >>>
> >>> On 8/14/14, 8:30 AM, "Kyle Mestery" <mestery at mestery.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Folks, I'm not sure if all CI accounts are running sufficient tests.
> >>>> Per the requirements wiki page here [1], everyone needs to be running
> >>>> more than just Tempest API tests, which I still see most neutron
> >>>> third-party CI setups doing. I'd like to ask everyone who operates a
> >>>> third-party CI account for Neutron to please look at the link below
> >>>> and make sure you are running appropriate tests. If you have
> >>>> questions, the weekly third-party meeting [2] is a great place to ask
> >>>> questions.
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks,
> >>>> Kyle
> >>>>
> >>>> [1] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/NeutronThirdPartyTesting
> >>>> [2] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/ThirdParty
> >>>>
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> >>>> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> >>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> >>> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> >>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> >> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> >>
> >_______________________________________________
> >OpenStack-dev mailing list
> >OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> >http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20140818/2668cc6b/attachment.html>
More information about the OpenStack-dev
mailing list