Open Stack

Hello Folks,

Based on today’s Neutron IRC meeting. I have modified the following wiki: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/NeutronThirdPartyTesting

You will find a new suction with the minimal requirements for Juno. If you have still some questions, please contact me directly.

I will start contacting each one of the owner directly and will update the table with the current Plugins and Drivers:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Neutron_Plugins_and_Drivers

Kind Regards,

Edgar

From: Hemanth Ravi <hemanthraviml at gmail.com<mailto:hemanthraviml at gmail.com>>
Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>>
Date: Monday, August 18, 2014 at 12:24 PM
To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>>, Kedar K <kedar.kulkarni at oneconvergence.com<mailto:kedar.kulkarni at oneconvergence.com>>, Deepak Gupta <deepak.gupta at oneconvergence.com<mailto:deepak.gupta at oneconvergence.com>>
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [third-party] What tests are required to be run

Edgar,

Our CI is running the tests (non voting), but don't see it listed on the review for any patch. Is this due to missing logs? I would like to confirm this is the issue, will resolve this.

Thanks,
-hemanth


On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 8:35 AM, Edgar Magana <edgar.magana at workday.com<mailto:edgar.magana at workday.com>> wrote:
Thank you Akihiro.

I will propose a better organization for this section. Stay tune!

Edgar

On 8/17/14, 10:53 PM, "Akihiro Motoki" <motoki at da.jp.nec.com<mailto:motoki at da.jp.nec.com>> wrote:

>
>On 2014/08/18 0:12, Kyle Mestery wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 5:35 PM, Edgar Magana
>><edgar.magana at workday.com<mailto:edgar.magana at workday.com>> wrote:
>>> Team,
>>>
>>> I did a quick audit on the Neutron CI. Very sad results. Only few
>>>plugins
>>> and drivers are running properly and testing all Neutron commits.
>>> I created a report here:
>>>
>>>https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Neutron_Plugins_and_Drivers#Existing_Plu
>>>gin
>>> _and_Drivers
>>>
>> Can you link this and/or move it to this page:
>>
>> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/NeutronPlugins
>>
>> This is under the "NeutronPolicies" wiki page which I did at the start
>> of Juno. This tracks all policies and procedures for Neutron, and
>> there's a Plugins page (which I linked to above) where this should
>> land.
>
>I just added the link Neutron_Plugins_and_Drivers#Existing_Plugin
>to NeutronPlugins wiki.
>
>The wiki pages NeutronPlugins and Neutron_Plugins_and_Drivers
>cover the similar contents. According to the history of the page,
>the latter one was created by Mark at Nov 2013 (beginning of Icehouse
>cycle).
>It seems better to merge these two pages to avoid the confusion.
>
>Akihiro
>
>>
>>>
>>> We will discuss the actions to take on the next Neutron IRC meeting. So
>>> please, reach me out to clarify what is the status of your CI.
>>> I had two commits to quickly verify the CI reliability:
>>>
>>> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/114393/
>>>
>>> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/40296/
>>>
>>>
>>> I would expect all plugins and drivers passing on the first one and
>>> failing for the second but I got so many surprises.
>>>
>>> Neutron code quality and reliability is a top priority, if you ignore
>>>this
>>> report that plugin/driver will be candidate to be remove from Neutron
>>>tree.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> Edgar
>>>
>>> P.s. I hate to be the inquisitor hereŠ but someone has to do the dirty
>>>job!
>>>
>> Thanks for sending this out Edgar and doing this analysis! Can you
>> please put an agenda item on Monday's meeting to discuss this? I won't
>> be at the meeting as I'm on PTO (Mark is running the meeting in my
>> absence), but I'd like the team to discuss this and allow all
>> third-party people a chance to be there and share their feelings here.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Kyle
>>
>>>
>>> On 8/14/14, 8:30 AM, "Kyle Mestery" <mestery at mestery.com<mailto:mestery at mestery.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Folks, I'm not sure if all CI accounts are running sufficient tests.
>>>> Per the requirements wiki page here [1], everyone needs to be running
>>>> more than just Tempest API tests, which I still see most neutron
>>>> third-party CI setups doing. I'd like to ask everyone who operates a
>>>> third-party CI account for Neutron to please look at the link below
>>>> and make sure you are running appropriate tests. If you have
>>>> questions, the weekly third-party meeting [2] is a great place to ask
>>>> questions.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Kyle
>>>>
>>>> [1] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/NeutronThirdPartyTesting
>>>> [2] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/ThirdParty
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>>>> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org<mailto:OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
>>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>>> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org<mailto:OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org<mailto:OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>_______________________________________________
>OpenStack-dev mailing list
>OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org<mailto:OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
>http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org<mailto:OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20140818/bae0c7e6/attachment.html>