[openstack-dev] [Neutron][policy] Group Based Policy - Renaming

Edgar Magana edgar.magana at workday.com
Thu Aug 7 21:54:16 UTC 2014


That I understand it!
Thanks for the clarification.

Edgar

From: Ryan Moats <rmoats at us.ibm.com<mailto:rmoats at us.ibm.com>>
Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>>
Date: Thursday, August 7, 2014 at 2:45 PM
To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>>
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][policy] Group Based Policy - Renaming


Edgar Magana <edgar.magana at workday.com<mailto:edgar.magana at workday.com>> wrote on 08/07/2014 04:37:39 PM:

> From: Edgar Magana <edgar.magana at workday.com<mailto:edgar.magana at workday.com>>
> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
> <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>>
> Date: 08/07/2014 04:40 PM
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][policy] Group Based Policy - Renaming
>
> Ryan,
>
> COPS implies a common protocol to communicate with PEPs, which
> implies the same communication mechanism basically.
> So, you are implying that "endpoints" in GBP will use "different"
> protocol to communicate with "decisions" entities?

Nope, I'm saying that the members of groups are not *required* to do enforcement.
They *could* (based on the implementation), but calling them PEPs means they would *have* to.

Ryan
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20140807/a7c1de2b/attachment.html>


More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list