[openstack-dev] [neutron] status of VPNaaS and FWaaS APIs in Icehouse

Sumit Naiksatam sumitnaiksatam at gmail.com
Sat Apr 26 19:22:04 UTC 2014


The so called multivendor work is dependent now on the "flavors"
framework.  Patches were presented in the Icehouse release to enable
multivendor support using the service-type-framework, however there
were concerns on the use of that framework, and hence those patches
were not approved in time.

A patch was presented in FWaaS to address the router/service insertion
issue, however that was blocked as well.

With the new blueprint process in place, the process on all of the
above patches has pretty much been reset.

Thanks,
~Sumit.

On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 6:48 AM, Akihiro Motoki <motoki at da.jp.nec.com> wrote:
> we need to correct the previous reply.
> ----
> Both should still be considered experimental because of
> the multivendor work was NOT completed in Icehouse.
> ----
> We can use only one service backend for each service and
> there are no way to choose a backend when creating a service instance.
>
> In addition, FWaaS API does not provides a way to specify
> a router which a firewall instance is applied to.
> It will be addressed in the service insertion blueprint.
>
> Akihiro
>
> (2014/04/25 6:55), McCann, Jack wrote:
>> Thanks Mark.
>>
>> What steps are necessary to promote these APIs beyond experimental?
>>
>> - Jack
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Mark McClain [mailto:mmcclain at yahoo-inc.com]
>>> Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2014 11:07 AM
>>> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>>> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] status of VPNaaS and FWaaS APIs in
>>> Icehouse
>>>
>>>
>>> On Apr 23, 2014, at 6:20 PM, McCann, Jack <jack.mccann at hp.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Are VPNaaS and FWaaS APIs still considered experimental in Icehouse?
>>>>
>>>> For VPNaaS, [1] says "This extension is experimental for the Havana release."
>>>> For FWaaS, [2] says "The Firewall-as-a-Service (FWaaS) API is an experimental
>>> API..."
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks for asking.  Both should still be considered experimental because of the
>>> multivendor work was completed in Icehouse.
>>>
>>>
>>>> [1] http://docs.openstack.org/api/openstack-network/2.0/content/vpnaas_ext.html
>>>> [2] http://docs.openstack.org/admin-guide-cloud/content/fwaas.html
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>>> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>> _______________________________________________
>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev



More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list