[openstack-dev] TC Candidacy
Tristan Cacqueray
tristan.cacqueray at enovance.com
Mon Apr 14 19:07:04 UTC 2014
confirmed
On 04/14/2014 05:45 PM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> I'd like to announce my candidacy as a TC member
>
> I'm Flavio Percoco. I'm a Software Engineer working for Red Hat and
> I've had the pleasure to be part of this community for more than a
> year already.
>
> During this time, many things have happened that I summarized in the
> "What I've done" section. I've several plans for my time as a TC
> member - in case I'm elected - but in order to keep this candidacy
> concise, I've written the plans I consider most important
> community-wise in the "Plans as TC Member" section.
>
> During this last year, I've seen our community grow really fast in
> terms of programs, projects and contributors. Although this amazes me,
> it also makes me realize how important it is to have a vast number
> opinions in our community. Furthermore, it makes me realize how
> important it is to bring those opinions to the light, listen to other
> folks that haven't done so and act to keep the community consistent. I
> believe this is one of the keys of the success of our community and
> this candidacy is a proofs of this belief of mine. We must spread our
> efforts throughout the community in order to do so.
> What I've done
> ==============
>
> My contributions to OpenStack started with Glance where I've dedicated
> a lot of time and efforts. This led me to contribute to Oslo, and then
> become a core contributor of it too. Contributing to Oslo has given me
> a wider view about what other projects needs are - w.r.t common code,
> libs and ways to do things - and this also helped me to understand how
> projects integrate with each other and gave me a more pragmatic idea
> of how things work and how they could be improved.
>
> While all this was happening, I was also contributing to one of the
> recently incubated projects, Marconi. Working on Marconi gave me a
> complete view of what new projects path is, what they need to
> accomplish before reaching incubation, what may make sense or not to
> have as an incubated project and which are the community and
> development standards that all projects should respect throughout
> OpenStack. I served as co-PTL of Marconi before it got incubated and,
> FWIW, I still do, although it's not an official role in OpenStack.
>
> In addition to the above, I'm also part of stable-maint team and I
> obviously work full-time on OpenStack.
>
> Plans as TC member
> ==================
>
> Being part of a project that was integrated not-long-ago has helped me
> understand how difficult it can be for new projects to ramp-up, the
> importance of continuous communication with existing projects, groups
> and the TC itself. Moreover, this has helped me understand that we
> probably have a clear path for existing projects but the path for new
> projects is yet to be defined.
>
> One of my goals as a TC member will be to work on a better plan to
> support new projects in the vary phases those projects have to go
> through (pre-incubation, incubation and graduation).
>
> New projects will certainly bring new requirements that may change the
> base of what we know nowadays as the "default" OpenStack deployment.
> So far, we've done a great job with keeping projects consistent and
> reducing the differences between them technology-wise. Nevertheless,
> this process hasn't been defined concretely nor has it been discussed
> enough.
>
> Making sure this process is defined and that it embraces a broader
> community and technology diversity will be part of my main goals as a
> TC member. I believe technical consistency is a key for the success of
> projects like OpenStack and its community but so is diversity. Since
> both paths have a trade-off, we need to define our guidelines in
> between them.
>
> With all that said, it's quite obvious that along with new projects
> there will likely be new contributors as well. We've done a great job
> with trying to simplify the process for new contributors. However,
> there's still quite a technical gap that new contributors have to go
> through in order to ramp up.
>
> As part of my previous goal, I plan to work on making new
> contributor's ramp-up process easier and make sure there's support for
> them. I believe it is part of the TC responsibilities to make sure
> this gap doesn't exist.
>
> These goals can't happen without taking under consideration existing
> projects, programs and communities. Therefore, during my time as a TC
> member, I'll focus on helping existing projects to live as an example
> for new and future projects.
>
> Thanks for reading and considering this proposal.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 555 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20140414/c0a2efd8/attachment.pgp>
More information about the OpenStack-dev
mailing list