[openstack-dev] [infra] Consolidating efforts around Fedora/Centos gate job
Derek Higgins
derekh at redhat.com
Fri Apr 11 15:06:34 UTC 2014
On 11/04/14 06:43, Ian Wienand wrote:
> Hi,
>
> To summarize recent discussions, nobody is opposed in general to
> having Fedora / Centos included in the gate. However, it raises a
> number of "big" questions : which job(s) to run on Fedora, where does
> the quota for extra jobs come from, how do we get the job on multiple
> providers, how stable will it be, how will we handle new releases,
> centos v fedora, etc.
>
> I think we agreed in [1] that the best thing to do is to start small,
> get some experience with multiple platforms and grow from there. Thus
> the decision to target a single job to test just incoming devstack
> changes on Fedora 20. This is a very moderate number of changes, so
> adding a separate test will not have a huge impact on resources.
>
> Evidence points to this being a good point to start. People
> submitting to devstack might have noticed comments from "redhatci"
> like [2] which reports runs of their change on a variety of rpm-based
> distros. Fedora 20 has been very stable, so we should not have many
> issues. Making sure it stays stable is very useful to build on for
> future gate jobs.
>
> I believe we decided that to make a non-voting job we could just focus
> on running on Rackspace and avoid the issues of older fedora images on
> hp cloud. Longer term, either a new hp cloud version comes, or DIB
> builds the fedora images ... either way we have a path to upgrading it
> to a voting job in time. Another proposal was to use the ooo cloud,
> but dprince feels that is probably better kept separate.
>
> Then we have the question of the nodepool setup scripts working on
> F20. I just tested the setup scripts from [3] and it all seems to
> work on a fresh f20 cloud image. I think this is due to kchamart,
> peila2 and others who've fixed parts of this before.
>
> So, is there:
>
> 1) anything blocking having f20 in the nodepool?
I believe it should work, I've also done manual runs and they went ok,
there may be minor differences when launched from nodepool but I don't
think anything major, anyways I submitted this earlier for another job
I'm proposing on nova-docker
http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2014-April/032493.html
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/86842/1
> 2) anything blocking a simple, non-voting job to test devstack
> changes on f20?
>
> Thanks,
>
> -i
>
> [1] http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/infra/2014/infra.2014-04-08-19.01.log.html#l-89
> [2] http://people.redhat.com/~iwienand/86310/
> [3] https://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack-infra/config/tree/modules/openstack_project/files/nodepool/scripts
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
More information about the OpenStack-dev
mailing list