Open Stack

On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 10:40 PM, Adam Young <ayoung at redhat.com> wrote:

> On 03/28/2014 03:01 AM, Tom Fifield wrote:
>
>> Thanks to those projects that responded. I've proposed sessions in swift,
>> ceilometer, tripleO and horizon.
>>
>
>
> Keystone would also be interested in user feedback, of course.


Crossing openstack-dev threads [1] here, gathering feedback on proposed
deprecations would be a great topic for such a session.

[1]
http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2014-April/031652.html


>
>
>> On 17/03/14 07:54, Tom Fifield wrote:
>>
>>> All,
>>>
>>> Many times we've heard a desire for more feedback and interaction from
>>> users. However, their attendance at design summit sessions is met with
>>> varied success.
>>>
>>> However, last summit, by happy accident, a swift session turned into a
>>> something a lot more user driven. A competent user was able to describe
>>> their use case, and the developers were able to stage a number of
>>> question to them. In this way, some of the assumptions about the way
>>> certain things were implemented, and the various priorities of future
>>> plans became clearer. It worked really well ... perhaps this is
>>> something we'd like to have happen for all the projects?
>>>
>>> *Idea*: Add an "ops" session for each project in the design summit
>>> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/ATL-ops-dedicated-
>>> design-summit-sessions
>>>
>>>
>>> Most operators running OpenStack tend to treat it more holistically than
>>> those coding it. They are aware of, but don't necessarily think or work
>>> in terms of project  breakdowns. To this end, I'd imagine the such
>>> sessions would:
>>>
>>>   * have a primary purpose for developers to ask the operators to answer
>>>     questions, and request information
>>>
>>>   * allow operators to tell the developers things (give feedback) as a
>>>     secondary purpose that could potentially be covered better in a
>>>     cross-project session
>>>
>>>   * need good moderation, for example to push operator-to-operator
>>>     discussion into forums with more time available (eg
>>>     https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/ATL-ops-unconference-RFC )
>>>
>>>   * be reinforced by having volunteer "good" users in potentially every
>>>     design summit session
>>>     (https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/ATL-ops-in-design-sessions )
>>>
>>>
>>> Anyway, just a strawman - please jump on the etherpad
>>> (https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/ATL-ops-dedicated-
>>> design-summit-sessions)
>>> or leave your replies here!
>>>
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>>
>>> Tom
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>>> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20140402/732d7737/attachment.html>