On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 2:43 PM, Robert Collins <robertc at robertcollins.net>wrote: > On 26 October 2013 08:40, Dolph Mathews <dolph.mathews at gmail.com> wrote:> > I'm all for low barriers of entry, so if there's > > any evidence that this is true, I'd want to make them more prolific. > > I'm not sure how to gather evidence for this, either for or against ;(. We do have a captive audience in a week or so to do unscientific room-temp surveys. Asking a question or two at the end of some sessions would at least give us a data point broader than ML participants. "Who would be resistant to enforcing removal modelines?" "Who would be resistant to enforcing addition of modelines?" "Who doesn't know or care what a modeline is?" For the record, I don't mind these things as long as they are at the end of the file. dt -- Dean Troyer dtroyer at gmail.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20131025/bdc6a73b/attachment.html>