Open Stack

Thanks,

I'm done here.

https://review.openstack.org/#/c/49316/

- Ozawa

> Ozawa, +1 to what Zhi said. Go ahead and submit a patch for review and we can consider it for Icehouse. Also try to attend the glance meeting if possible and we can discuss it there.
> 
> Having better uploads/downloads and specifically better error handling for uploads and downloads would definitely help conserve resources and improve time taken.
> 
> Iccha
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: "Zhi Yan Liu" <lzy.dev at gmail.com>
> Sent: Monday, September 30, 2013 1:29am
> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List" <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Proposed S3 multi-part upload functionality
> 
> On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 12:22 PM, Masashi Ozawa <mozawa at cloudian.com> wrote:
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > We already created the blueprint for this feature below belore, if
> > Glance can use S3 MultiPart Upload REST API for the large objects in
> > future release as Amazon recommends it for the large object to be
> > uploaded, I believe that it's very useful for the customers and a good
> > thing for AWS and other S3 servers.
> >
> > https://blueprints.launchpad.net/glance/+spec/s3-multi-part-upload
> >
> > However it's not in the future release list so we actually implemeted
> > this feature based on Grizzly for an internal testing porpose and it
> > works so far.
> >
> > Made the implementation strategy below. So please review this so that
> > we can hopefully have this feature in the future openstack release.
> >
> > - Proposal S3 multi-part upload functionality
> > https://etherpad.openstack.org/s3-multi-part-upload
> >
> > thanks,
> > - Ozawa
> > --
> > Cloudian KK - http://cloudian.jp/
> > Masashi Ozawa <mozawa at cloudian.com>
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > OpenStack-dev mailing list
> > OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> 
> Hello Masashi Ozawa,
> 
> I consider it's a worth enhancement for s3 store driver, with a minor
> change and a boto requirement update. You can just prepare your patch
> base on the trunk code and commit it to Gerrit to allow team take a
> review If you like.
> Actually I'm just thinking if a resume-broken-transfer (image
> uploading and downloading) is a useful thing for Glance as a common
> requirement/enhancement. Any thoughts from you(s)?
> 
> thanks,
> zhiyan
>