Open Stack

On 11/16/2013 01:14 PM, Anita Kuno wrote:
> On 11/16/2013 12:37 PM, Sean Dague wrote:
>> On 11/15/2013 10:36 AM, Russell Bryant wrote:
>>> On 11/13/2013 11:10 AM, Anita Kuno wrote:
>>>> Neutron Tempest code sprint
>>>>
>>>> In the second week of January in Montreal, Quebec, Canadathere will be a
>>>> Neutron Tempest code sprint to improve the status of Neutron tests in
>>>> Tempest and to add new tests.
>>> First off, I think anything regarding putting more effort into this is
>>> great.  However, I *beg* the Neutron team not to wait until this week to
>>> make significant progress.
>>>
>>> To be clear, IMO, this is already painfully late.  It's one of the
>>> largest items blocking deprecation of nova-network and moving forward
>>> with Neutron.  This spring is just a couple weeks before icehouse-2.
>>> Come i2, mid-cycle, we're going to have make a call on whether or not
>>> nova-network deprecation seems likely.  If not, we really can't wait
>>> around and I will probably propose un-freezing nova-network.
>> 100% agreed. Realistically this has to be a capping session, not when
>> the real work starts. If the agent rewrite isn't done, and the parallel
>> gate basically working before then, it won't work.
>>
>> Honestly, I think we're going to need to checkpoint before Christmas to
>> figure out if the preconditions are met, because if they aren't, then
>> it's not clear the 3 days of code sprint are really going to generate
>> the results we need.
>>
>> I'm encouraged by the level of activity in the neutron channel, so I
>> think right now planning for success is good. But again, we need some
>> aggressive check points, and people need to realize this is not the
>> beginning of this work, it is the closing session.
>>
>> 	-Sean
> Great. What kind of check points in a mutual location would we like to 
> see?
>
> Etherpad?
>
> Meeting logs?
>
> Other suggestions?
>
> Thanks Sean,
> Anita.
Actually I am going to answer my own question with a proposal.

I would like to see a special sub-committee of the TC convened comprised 
of (5?) TC members and/or appointees for the express purpose of being 
available to help meet this goal, be available in the -neutron irc 
channel for questions and support and also to guide the process so the 
goal is achieved.

Thoughts?

Anita.
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20131116/347f4ee3/attachment.html>