<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 11/16/2013 01:14 PM, Anita Kuno
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:5287B61B.3060401@anteaya.info" type="cite">
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 11/16/2013 12:37 PM, Sean Dague
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:5287AD63.8040400@dague.net" type="cite">
<pre wrap="">On 11/15/2013 10:36 AM, Russell Bryant wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">On 11/13/2013 11:10 AM, Anita Kuno wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Neutron Tempest code sprint
In the second week of January in Montreal, Quebec, Canadathere will be a
Neutron Tempest code sprint to improve the status of Neutron tests in
Tempest and to add new tests.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">First off, I think anything regarding putting more effort into this is
great. However, I *beg* the Neutron team not to wait until this week to
make significant progress.
To be clear, IMO, this is already painfully late. It's one of the
largest items blocking deprecation of nova-network and moving forward
with Neutron. This spring is just a couple weeks before icehouse-2.
Come i2, mid-cycle, we're going to have make a call on whether or not
nova-network deprecation seems likely. If not, we really can't wait
around and I will probably propose un-freezing nova-network.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">100% agreed. Realistically this has to be a capping session, not when
the real work starts. If the agent rewrite isn't done, and the parallel
gate basically working before then, it won't work.
Honestly, I think we're going to need to checkpoint before Christmas to
figure out if the preconditions are met, because if they aren't, then
it's not clear the 3 days of code sprint are really going to generate
the results we need.
I'm encouraged by the level of activity in the neutron channel, so I
think right now planning for success is good. But again, we need some
aggressive check points, and people need to realize this is not the
beginning of this work, it is the closing session.
-Sean</pre>
</blockquote>
Great. What kind of check points in a mutual location would we
like to see?<br>
<br>
Etherpad?<br>
<br>
Meeting logs?<br>
<br>
Other suggestions?<br>
<br>
Thanks Sean,<br>
Anita.<br>
</blockquote>
Actually I am going to answer my own question with a proposal.<br>
<br>
I would like to see a special sub-committee of the TC convened
comprised of (5?) TC members and/or appointees for the express
purpose of being available to help meet this goal, be available in
the -neutron irc channel for questions and support and also to guide
the process so the goal is achieved.<br>
<br>
Thoughts?<br>
<br>
Anita.<br>
<blockquote cite="mid:5287B61B.3060401@anteaya.info" type="cite">
<blockquote cite="mid:5287AD63.8040400@dague.net" type="cite">
<pre wrap="">
</pre>
<br>
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<br>
<pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
<a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org">OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org</a>
<a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev">http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>