Open Stack

Le 14/11/2013 20:46, Clint Byrum a écrit :
>
> Now, choose which city will grow faster and produce more innovation.
>

The problem is larger than only innovation, it is also making sure the 
Stackforge projects are also a starting point for contributing to 
Openstack in a different manner. ATCs can also get the opportunity to 
jump in another project on their spare time if they wish.
Isolating Stackforge projects into a separate mailing-list would then 
reduce visibility to Stackforge projects and as a consequence would 
reduce the permeability between Openstack and Stackforge.

On a technical note, as a Stackforge contributor, I'm trying to 
implement best practices of Openstack coding into my own project, and 
I'm facing day-to-day issues trying to understand what Oslo libs do or 
how they can be used in a fashion manner. Should I want to ask question 
to the community, I would have to cross-post to both lists.

One last point, having two different lists with most of people 
subscribing to both wouldn't help reduce the noise, as you would still 
get all the messages (maybe in two different folders, but still 
getting'em). I totally agree with the fact that openstack-dev@ is noisy. 
That said, we need to enforce the use of Subject headers and maybe 
accept meetings reminders are not relevant to be communicated using this 
channel (we could still notify people within the IRC rooms) and chase up 
any non-development question, that would be a first step for that.

One last thing I'm thinking about is logging IRC channel discussions so 
we could keep track of discussions over there, that would maybe help 
reducing the number of chatty messages we're sending off to the list 
just about implementation or reviews concerns.

2cts,
-Sylvain