[openstack-dev] [Nova] A proposal for group API extension
Ravi Chunduru
ravivsn at gmail.com
Fri May 10 22:54:19 UTC 2013
I agree that policy should not have default instead as an empty list.
On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 3:27 PM, Senhua Huang (senhuang) <senhuang at cisco.com
> wrote:
> You are right, Russell. Policies are not mandatory. Probably we should
> make its default value as an empty list: meaning that only a membership is
> maintained among all the VM instances, but no other constraints are imposed
> on them.
>
> Thanks,
> Senhua
>
> On May 10, 2013, at 12:54 PM, Russell Bryant <rbryant at redhat.com> wrote:
>
> > On 05/10/2013 12:56 PM, Ravi Chunduru wrote:
> >> VM group is a good feature to have.
> >> What are the proposed different group policies?
> >> Can we have group affinity as optional policy. I get a feeling it is
> >> must from the document.
> >
> > I was assuming all policies are optional. It's not much of a policy if
> > it's mandatory. :-)
> >
> > --
> > Russell Bryant
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > OpenStack-dev mailing list
> > OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
--
Ravi
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20130510/58696662/attachment.html>
More information about the OpenStack-dev
mailing list