Open Stack

On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 5:32 AM, Thierry Carrez <thierry at openstack.org>wrote:

> Sean Dague wrote:
> > Does everything need to live under a program to get accounted for?
> > Devstack isn't really a natural fit into the existing categories. Those
> > of us that work on it tend to span a lot of categories anyway. I think
> > as long as we acknowledge that it's an important project, and it's
> > contributors will get counted as ATCs, where it fits in, or if it fits
> > in to a program isn't all that important.
>
> Part of the rationale behind "programs" was to stop creating special
> cases in the "official projects" list, and create some flexibility for
> programs to add code repositories... So I would very much prefer if all
> the contributions that grant ATC status fit somewhere in the taxonomy.
>
>
Agreed with this and all of the discussion so far.



> devstack could be its own program though, if the team caring for it is
> really disjoint from Infrastructure and QA.
>
>
I see DevStack under Infra and QA in its current role for the myriad
projects.

Dare I ask, what about TryStack? Infra seems to get a ton under it but
that's where I'd place it if I had to state a preference.

Anne


> --
> Thierry Carrez (ttx)
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>



-- 
Anne Gentle
annegentle at justwriteclick.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20130625/c1cf501a/attachment.html>